IGNOU MAEC Project Hard Copy (MECP 301, MECP 201, MECP 202): Printed Report Sets and Submission

IGNOU MAEC Project Hard Copy: Printed Sets for MECP 301, MECP 201 and MECP 202

The report stage of the MA Economics project is physical by nature. Under the October 2024 MECP-201 and MECP-202 guides you print two hard copies of a typed report, post one to the SED Division at IGNOU headquarters with a CD, keep the other, and later face a viva on what you posted. This page covers that stage: how the bound volume is put together, where it goes, what happens after, and how a printed reference set fits in. The proposal stage, topics and supervisor rules sit on the IGNOU MAEC Project soft copy page.

Two groups of students order from this shelf. Those admitted recently carry MECP 301 in their course list; students already in the running batches carry MECP 201 or MECP 202. Tell us which one is printed on your registration when you order a set.

Printed Set, PDF or Both: Which One a MAEC Student Needs

The IGNOU MAEC Project reference sets come in two formats with the same studies: printed sets here, and PDFs in the soft copy category. The format matters less than the moment you buy it. Match your situation to a row:

Printed set, PDF, or both?

Many students holding a fresh MAEC approval letter ask us what shape the MECP report should take. A printed set shows that shape on paper; for MECP-201 and MECP-202 the rules behind it are in sections 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 of the guide.

Order early if you want paper. Our records show 70 to 80 percent of students starting work only in the final month before a submission date, and an MA Economics student who orders a printed model in that month leaves little time to read it.

Some MAEC students hold back their report in the hope of an extended date. No one can tell in advance whether IGNOU will extend, and a MECP-201 or MECP-202 report still has to be printed and sent with its CD before any date.

Ask which printed set suits your code

Six Printed MA Economics Project Report Sets on This Shelf

Each printed set on this IGNOU MAEC Project shelf pairs a synopsis with an MA Economics project report on one study. The study titles are below, with the kind of evidence each title points to, so you can pick the set nearest to the study you are planning.

Many MA Economics reports we see rest on secondary data alone. The MECP guides accept that and list secondary sources first, and ask that a primary survey, used where published data does not answer your question, stay small: “not more than 100 observations”.

Printing Questions on the IGNOU MAEC Project

From Approval Letter to Result: The Report-Stage Track

An IGNOU MAEC Project report can only be written and evaluated after the proposal is approved; the guides say a report sent without an approved proposal “will not be evaluated under any circumstances”. From the approval letter onwards, the stages run like this:

From approval letter to result

Keep the MECP approval letter open while you write. Its comments belong in the report, and many students skip them.

Most MA Economics approvals we see carry correction or modification points, most often a request to update the review of literature. Make those changes in Chapter 2 or wherever your MECP review sits before printing.

IGNOU MAEC Project Viva and the Copy You Keep

The IGNOU MAEC Project viva is the second component of evaluation in both October 2024 guides: the report carries 70 percent and the viva-voce 30 percent, and each minimum must be met separately.

MECP 201 project report and viva

MECP-201 (Project Work-I, 6 credits, Semester IV) marks the report out of 70 and the viva out of 30; the guide asks for at least 28 and 12 respectively.

MECP 202 project report and viva

MECP-202 (Project Work-II, 4 credits, Semester IV) marks the report out of 35 and the viva out of 15; the guide asks for at least 14 and 6 respectively.

For both codes the guides say the viva “will be conducted by the Economics Discipline at the Headquarter through any of the electronic mode like Whats’app, Google Meet, etc.”

For a student who submits on paper this has a practical side. The posted copy does not come back, so the second printed copy is the only printed version of your report in your hands during the viva. Keep it identical to the posted copy, page numbers included. The report marks themselves divide as follows in both guides: analysis and interpretation 25 percent, methodology 20, clarity of objectives 15, and clarity of topic, language, conclusions and references 10 each.

“Is there a viva for the MAEC project?” is a question we answer often. For MECP-201 and MECP-202 it is yes, and the MECP-202 proforma asks for your email and mobile number for that reason.

Below 40 Percent: What the Resubmission Packet Holds

If the result falls below 40 percent in the report and viva components, IGNOU informs the student and sends the evaluator’s comments. The guides then ask for a second packet to SED, Block 12:

1. The project work and report, redone in the light of the evaluator’s comments.
2. Annexures B and C. Annexure A is not needed again; the Annexure C wording already covers work “redone in the light of evaluator’s comments”.
3. A demand draft of Rs 1,000 in favour of IGNOU, payable at New Delhi.

Payment modes change over time, so ask SED whether a draft is still the accepted mode before you buy one.

Keep the postal receipt for each MAEC packet, first submission and resubmission alike. Students who skip it have nothing to show when a MECP result does not appear.

Posting the IGNOU MAEC Project Report to SED, Block 12

Under MECP-201 and MECP-202 the finished IGNOU MAEC Project report goes to the SED Division, not to the School of Social Sciences that approved the proposal and not to your Regional Centre. Prepare two hard copies, send one with a CD containing the soft copy, and keep the other; IGNOU will not send the posted copy back. The address in both guides:

Registrar
SED Division, Block 12
Indira Gandhi National Open University
Maidan Garhi, New Delhi 110068

The guides name Registered Post or Speed Post for the proposal but no mode for the report. The project evaluation fee is paid with your Term-End Examination form: Rs 300 for a project of up to 4 credits (MECP-202, MECP-301) and Rs 500 above 4 credits (MECP-201), per the July 2026 Common Prospectus, which applies these slabs from the January 2023 admission cycle; the fee is not refundable. For the December 2026 cycle, IGNOU’s Regional Centre Noida has posted a notice titled “Submission of Project/Internship/Practical course fee for term-end examination (TEE). December 2026”; read it for the fee date.

Emailing the MA Economics report to an IGNOU address is a shortcut some students try. The MECP guides route it on paper with a CD to SED, Block 12; if IGNOU notifies an online upload for your cycle, that notice is the route instead.

Students regularly ask us how many MAEC copies to print and where each goes. For MECP-201 and MECP-202: two printed, one posted with the CD to SED, one kept.

The Rs 300 and Rs 500 project fees get mixed up at our counter. The slab follows the credits on your registration: 4 credits for MECP-202 and MECP-301, 6 for MECP-201.

Front to Back: How a Bound MECP Project Report Is Assembled

The MECP-201 and MECP-202 guides fix the order of an IGNOU MAEC Project report’s opening pages and name the items it must carry. The sheet below turns that into the order of a bound volume.

• Reports come back when the bound MAEC volume misses an item its course requires. For MECP-201 and MECP-202 check three before you close the envelope: Annexure B as the first page, Annexure C signed, and the CD.
• Page order is a frequent doubt among MA Economics students who show us their drafts. Number the pages after the volume is in the order above, so the contents page matches the bound copy.
• Some MECP reports are still sent in spiral bound. The guides say IGNOU would “prefer to receive a typed and bound copy”, so bind the report as a volume.

Get a printed model before you bind

Annexure B and Annexure C, the Two Signed Pages

Two forms in the MECP guides end up inside the bound IGNOU MAEC Project report, and both carry signatures.

Annexure B, the first page. It prints “Programme Code: MEC” and the course code (MECP-201 or MECP-202 in the respective guide), then lines for enrolment number, study centre code, Regional Centre and the topic. Below them sits a declaration you sign: the work “has been done by me and has not been submitted elsewhere. Further, the report has not been copied from any source.” Your name, address and year follow.

Annexure C, the certificate. Your supervisor certifies that the project “is his/her own work and has been done/redone in the light of evaluator’s comments under my supervision” and recommends that it be placed before the examiner, then signs with name, address, study centre, Regional Centre and date. The guide text asks for the Annexure C declaration to be “duly signed by you and your supervisor”, so sign it too.

Write your own course code on Annexure B exactly as your registration shows it. The printed “MEC” differs from MAEC, the code the guides themselves carry; if that matters for your case, ask the Programme Coordinator before binding.

An unsigned Annexure C is a gap we see in MA Economics reports. Get the supervisor’s signature and date on it before printing the final copies, because both bound MECP copies should match.

Some students attach each filled-in questionnaire at the end of their MAEC report. The MECP guides do not ask for filled forms; one blank copy of the tool is the usual practice.

Print Settings the MECP Guides Fix, and Those They Leave Open

For an IGNOU MAEC Project report, the guides set a short list of print rules: typed, one and a half line spacing, about 15,000 to 20,000 words (between 50 and 60 pages), English or Hindi, and a preference for a typed and bound copy. Photographs, maps, diagrams and illustrations may be used where they are needed.

They do not set a paper size, font, font size, margin width or binding style, and they ask for no abstract. Those are layout choices; treat a page that presents them as IGNOU rules with caution. A 10,000 to 15,000 word limit, which the earlier version of this page also warned about, belongs to the MPA project course MPAP 2 in the July 2026 Common Prospectus, not to MA Economics.

Some MAEC reports we see overshoot the length the guides set, and reports that run well past the limit can come back. Check the word count of the MECP report before you print two copies.

MAEC Project Report Chapters: Four to Five, Each With a Summing Up

The guides ask for the MAEC project report chapters to number about four to five, each subdivided into sections and closing with a paragraph of “summing up”. The research methodology must be stated in the first chapter. A review of similar studies takes two to three pages at most, and the last chapter lists findings objective by objective, with suggestions if any. The guides also ask for simple words and short sentences, a first draft edited for language and content, and arguments backed by your own logic, data or published material.

The analysis chapter is the weak point in many MA Economics reports that come to us: its tables do not carry the objectives and method set in Chapter 1. In the MECP rubric, analysis and interpretation is the heaviest single criterion.

Some MAEC analysis chapters rest on assumed figures with no survey behind them. Each number in a MECP report should trace to your own fieldwork or a named source, since the examiner and the viva can ask where it came from.

An outdated review of studies costs marks in our experience. Keep the MECP review within the guide’s two to three pages and bring its sources up to date before printing.

References, Bibliography and Appendix in the Printed Report

The reference list starts on its own page, headed References and centred, in alphabetical order of the author’s surname (or the first two title words where there is no author), with author, title, publication data and publisher, plus where and when you retrieved an online source. The guides illustrate an author-date pattern for books, government publications, conference papers, encyclopaedias, journal articles, electronic documents and websites. For each secondary data source, the guides also ask you to record who collected it, when, the full title, the agency or author and the edition.

We often see MA Economics references that mix styles, or that leave out the data series the tables actually use. Follow the author-date pattern the MECP guide illustrates and list each secondary source behind your tables.

Check the MAEC review of studies against the reference page before printing: each author cited should be listed, and each listed source should be cited. The two often drift apart in the drafts we see.

If your MECP study used a questionnaire or schedule, put it in the appendix. Reports that leave the tool out are common among those we see.

MECP 301 Project Report: What a Printed Set Can Settle While No MECP 301 Guide Is Found

The July 2026 Common Prospectus lists MECP-301 Project Work, 4 credits, in each of the three new Semester IV groups (A Data Analytics, B Insurance and Finance, C Social Policy). In searches made on 16 October 2026 we found no separate MECP-301 guide on eGyanKosh or the IGNOU website, so its report address, marks split and viva arrangement could not be confirmed from any IGNOU document we found.

A MECP 301 project report can still borrow what does not depend on the code: chapter structure, page order, how tables are read in words and how references are listed. What it should not borrow without checking is any route, mark or fee rule taken from the MECP-201 or MECP-202 guide. The fee slab is already clear from the prospectus (Rs 300, up to 4 credits). The medium needs care: the prospectus marks Groups A and B “available only in English”, while Group C carries no such mark, so a Hindi report in Group A or B is something to confirm with the Programme Coordinator, MA (Economics), School of Social Sciences, first.

Students ask us whether a notified date is meant for the synopsis or the report. For MECP-201 and MECP-202 the guides give the proposal no date of its own, and the project fee, whose date IGNOU notifies each cycle, is paid with the Term-End Examination form at the report stage; for MECP 301, with no guide found, ask the Programme Coordinator.

The Proposal Packet Still Comes First

No printed report reaches evaluation without an approved proposal. Under MECP-201 and MECP-202 that proposal, typed in about 4 to 5 pages with the signed Annexure A proforma and the supervisor’s signed bio-data, goes by Registered Post or Speed Post to the Programme Coordinator, MA (Economics) Programme, School of Social Sciences, Tagore Bhawan, IGNOU, Maidan Garhi, New Delhi 110068. The earlier version of this page gave a “Course Coordinator … Block F” address; use the Tagore Bhawan address from the 2024 guides. The topic and its wording must not change after the proposal is sent. The seven proposal parts, the supervisor rules and the Annexure A boxes are set out on the soft copy page.

Some MA Economics students plan to post the synopsis and the printed report together near a date. The MECP route has two stages: the proposal to Tagore Bhawan first, the report to SED only after approval, with the supervisor’s signature on Annexure C.

Leave room for the wait. In our experience approval of a synopsis takes two to three months, while the MECP guides promise only that it will be sent “in due course”.

Late starts squeeze the writing too. Many students leave the MAEC proposal so late that no time is left to write it themselves, and the report stage then inherits the same pressure.

A Printed Reference Set Is Not a Submission

Every IGNOU MAEC Project report under MECP-201 and MECP-202 carries your signed declaration that it “has not been copied from any source”. The guides add that the soft copy is checked by anti-plagiarism software, that copying any published or unpublished project leads to cancellation, and that a copied report draws a penalty “as per UGC rule”. A printed reference set shows structure; the topic, data, analysis and words of your report must be your own.

Proposals that draw on the same widely shared material, or on one outside source, tend to share their topic with other students’ work, and in our experience duplicated topics are a frequent reason for return. A MECP title tied to your own district and period makes that less likely.

Reports sent in unchanged from an AI tool’s output are one reason the same MA Economics topics keep reappearing at our desk. The MECP declaration you sign covers the whole report.

Paragraphs lifted from websites and printed without any plagiarism check are a risk we warn MAEC students about. The CD goes through software, and no tool can promise a clean result for text you did not write.

For a check of your own proposal before you post it, see our customised project service.

Find the printed set closest to your study

IGNOU Files Read for This Page

Shri Chakradhar Publication (shrichakradhar.com) is an independent publisher and is not affiliated with, authorised by or endorsed by Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU). Course codes, fees and procedures are set by IGNOU. The printed MAEC synopsis and report sets sold here are study reference material only, not for submission as your own work; your proposal, data, analysis and report must be your own.

Call or WhatsApp: 9354637830 | Contact Shri Chakradhar Publication