IGNOU MAPFHS Project MEDSP-071 (MEDSP 71): Synopsis, Report, PDF and Hard Copy

IGNOU MAPFHS Project (MEDSP-071): an 8-credit elective, explained

The IGNOU MAPFHS Project counts as one of the five courses you choose in Year II, so a learner who takes it sits four theory papers that year instead of five. The MAPFHS Programme Guide (January 2024) says in section 3.7 that the programme offers project work “as an elective and not a compulsory course”. Launch Notification No. 132 of 26 December 2023, which started MAPFHS from the January 2024 session, marks MEDSP-071 with the same star as the six theory electives.

Two pairs of dates sit in the MEDSP-071 handbook: 30 April and 31 October for the proposal, 31 May and 30 November for the report. MAPFHS learners often write to us unsure which pair applies to their stage, so the calendar section below sets the two side by side.

Learners who completed the PGDPFHS can enter Year II of MAPFHS directly, according to the note under section 3.49 of the prospectus, and they face the same elective choice. The Programme Guide also lists one counselling session for project work at each Study Centre, which is worth attending before you settle a topic.

Three MEDSP 71 sample sets, matched to the MAPFHS course behind each

Each IGNOU MAPFHS project sample PDF on this site carries a proposal and a full report on one population or family health topic. Read one to see how a finished MEDSP-071 study is built, then plan your own title from your own district.

When to send what: the MEDSP-071 calendar

For the IGNOU MAPFHS Project, the handbook gives target dates for the proposal by admission session and result windows for the report. None of them is a closing date: section 6(3) accepts proposals “throughout the year” with a delay in completing the programme, and section 7(2) accepts reports at any time.

In our records, 70 to 80 percent of project students become active only in the last month before a submission date, and with a 30 November report window most of them start in October. For MEDSP-071 that leaves no room for a four-week approval wait before the report itself is due.

A common pattern at our desk: the MAPFHS proposal goes into the post in the final week before 30 April or 31 October, and the learner then expects the report window to stay open for them.

Some learners hold back their MEDSP-071 work because they expect IGNOU to push each date by a month. That is a guess about a future notice, and if no extension comes, the result simply moves to the next Term-end Examination.

IGNOU MAPFHS project topics: the 35 areas in Annexure I, sorted

The IGNOU MAPFHS Project handbook prints 35 “sample areas” in Annexure I, and most of them were written for urban and development programmes. Only a handful read as population or family health studies as printed. The table groups all 35 by the MAPFHS course they lean on, so you can see which areas need a population or health angle before they become a MEDSP-071 title.

Several scheme names in Annexure I are older than the handbook’s 2024 date. Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (areas 6 and 27 to 29) was folded into Samagra Shiksha in 2018, the Mid-day Meal Scheme (area 14) became PM POSHAN in 2021, and JNNURM (area 11) closed in 2014 with AMRUT following in 2015. A title that studies the old scheme should say which years it covers. Area 33 names NFHS-5, the 2019-21 round of the National Family Health Survey.

MAPFHS learners often believe the MEDSP-071 title must be one of the 35 lines in Annexure I. The annexure itself says the areas are samples for ideas and do not restrict your choice, so a family health title from your own district is open to you.

Choosing the topic is the step MAPFHS learners describe to us as the hardest, and many add that no class taught them how to frame a population study proposal. The one counselling session for project work listed in the Programme Guide is the closest thing to that class.

Evaluators’ comments that reach our desk often ask for a study set in the learner’s own city or block. For MEDSP-071 this matches the handbook’s own topic test of communication facilities and local language.

From a MAPFHS course to a workable MEDSP 071 title

A strong title for the IGNOU MAPFHS Project names a population group, a place and one measurable thing. The frame below starts from a course you studied and ends with a title you complete yourself; the blanks are yours to fill.

When a supervisor sends the MEDSP-071 title back for several rounds of changes, the proposal can slip by weeks. Learners who agree the title and objectives with the supervisor in one sitting usually keep their 30 April or 31 October target.

Survey or case study: what section 3 of the handbook allows

For the IGNOU MAPFHS Project the handbook advises a case study or a survey method, and it explains both at length in sections 4 and 5. A survey suits a question about many people, such as contraceptive use in a ward. A case study suits one unit studied in depth: a family, an anganwadi centre, a self help group or a health programme in one block.

The handbook names NSSO, NFHS and CRS/VRS as examples of sample surveys and calls a primary survey “far more reliable” than a secondary one. It also asks that participation be voluntary and that answers stay confidential. Section 3 refers you to “MEDSP-075” for method; the course meant is MEDS-075 Research Methodology in Population and Family Health Studies, whose Block 2 covers measurement and sampling.

Some reports we are shown build the data chapter on figures that were not collected. In a MEDSP-071 survey the respondents, the schedule and the counts must come from your own fieldwork, because your signature on Annexure III certifies the report as your original work.

Who can supervise the IGNOU MAPFHS Project

The IGNOU MAPFHS Project needs a supervisor from one of three routes in section 6(2) of the handbook, and SOEDS can refuse a supervisor who does not fit. If that happens, or if you change supervisor later, the proposal goes in afresh with the new supervisor’s signature as a new proposal.

The supervisor receives a token honorarium of Rs 500 from the University, claimed on the Annexure IV bill sent with your report. The handbook also says the supervisor, or your Study Centre or Regional Centre, can give a letter of authorisation that helps you collect data from a hospital, school or office.

Many MAPFHS learners pick a MEDSP-071 supervisor before reading route (b). A lecturer with a Masters but less than 5 years of experience does not meet it, and the proposal then waits on a new name.

Learners often ask their Study Centre coordinator to assign a MEDSP-071 supervisor and get no name. The handbook leaves the choice to you, so check the three routes and approach a counsellor or teacher yourself.

Some learners tell us no supervisor was available, so they asked a relative or a family friend. That can work for the IGNOU MAPFHS Project only if the person fits route (a), (b) or (c); check the route before the proforma is signed.

Annexure II and the supervisor’s bio-data, box by box

The Annexure II proforma is the cover sheet SOEDS reads first, and the faculty member’s decision on both the proposal and the supervisor is written in its office box. Its printed heading says “(MEDSP-075)”; it is the MEDSP-071 form all the same, and Annexure IV and the title page model carry the right code.

The supervisor’s bio-data runs to about 2 pages and must carry date of birth, full office and residential addresses, telephone numbers, qualifications with years of passing, and work experience with designation and organisation, signed by the supervisor. The form warns that a proposal without complete, signed bio-data “will not be entertained”, even when the supervisor is a MAPFHS counsellor.

Proformas we check for MEDSP-071 learners often have the supervisor’s address half filled, and now and then the learner’s own e-mail or postal address is blank.

A blank “Title of the project” box is one of the reasons we have seen proposals come back. On the MAPFHS form it is the box SOEDS uses to match your proposal to your later report.

We have seen MEDSP-071 proposals returned when the supervisor’s bio-data had no signature, stamp or working contact. The handbook’s list of bio-data details is worth ticking off line by line.

IGNOU MAPFHS project synopsis: seven headings on 4 to 5 typed pages

The IGNOU MAPFHS project synopsis is called the project proposal in most of the handbook, and section 6(3) asks for one typed copy of 4 to 5 pages. Section 6(1) lists what it must state, and the handbook points to Block 1, Unit 1 of MEDS-075 for how to write a good proposal.

MEDSP 071 synopsis or project proposal?

Both words describe the same document for MEDSP 71. The handbook mostly says “project proposal”, then in section 6(3) asks students to “retain a copy of the synopsis”. Hypotheses are not among the seven headings, so add them only if your study design tests one.

Many MEDSP-071 proposals we see miss one of the seven headings, most often Problem Statement or Limitations, or fold the methodology into the introduction.

In MAPFHS proposals, the studies discussed in the introduction often do not appear in the reference list at the end. Check each name and year against the list before printing.

Proposals come back when the reason for the study is missing or the schedule is only promised. For a MEDSP-071 survey, describe the interview schedule in the methodology and attach a draft if your supervisor agrees.

Posting the MEDSP 71 proposal to Block 15-F

Section 6(3) and the handbook’s notes on the proposal ask for one packet of three documents, posted to the Project Coordinator. Send only one copy and keep a copy of everything.

Learners regularly ask us what “the proforma” is. For MEDSP-071 it is Annexure II only; the originality certificate and the bill belong to the report stage.

Now and then a learner plans a handwritten MAPFHS proposal. Section 6(3) asks for a typed proposal, so print it.

A frequent doubt is whether the proposal should be bound or filed. The MEDSP-071 handbook asks for the three documents and says nothing about binding the proposal, so a stapled or clipped set meets the text.

The proposal goes to SOEDS, not to your Study Centre

The IGNOU MAPFHS Project uses two addresses at two stages, both at Maidan Garhi. The proposal goes to the Project Coordinator (MAPFHS) at SOEDS; the finished report goes later to the Student Evaluation Division. Your Study Centre and Regional Centre receive neither, though they may help with an authorisation letter.

MAPFHS learners sometimes hand the MEDSP-071 proposal to their Study Centre or Regional Centre, where it can sit for weeks. For this course the handbook sends it straight to SOEDS at Maidan Garhi, so a hand delivery there is the correct office.

Some learners think the proposal and report travel together at the end. For MEDSP-071 the report is written only after approval, and the approved Annexure II becomes the second page of that report.

Many learners post the MEDSP-071 packet and keep no postal receipt. The receipt and tracking number are your only proof of the date it reached Block 15-F.

Four weeks from receipt: waiting for the MEDSP-071 decision

Section 6(4) of the IGNOU MAPFHS Project handbook says SOEDS sends a written approval or non-approval within four weeks of receiving the proposal, by e-mail and by post. The handbook lists Dr. Sarda Prasad (sardaprasad@ignou.ac.in) as course coordinator; the July 2026 prospectus names Dr. Sarda Prasad and Prof. Grace Don Nemching (gdnemching@ignou.ac.in) as programme coordinators.

Many MAPFHS learners do not know whom to ask when four weeks pass with no reply. For MEDSP-071 the course coordinator at SOEDS is the address in the handbook, and an e-mail with your enrolment number and posting date is a fair first step.

Across IGNOU project courses, approval often reaches students in two to three months in our experience. The MEDSP-071 handbook promises four weeks, so allow for the post as well when you plan.

We have seen students whose approval letter did not arrive and whose session ran out while they waited. For a MEDSP-071 proposal, a follow-up to SOEDS after the fourth week costs nothing.

Approved with comments, or not approved

An approved MEDSP-071 proposal often comes back with comments on the Annexure II office box, and those comments belong in the report. A non-approved proposal comes with suggestions for reformulating it, and section 6(5) asks for a resubmission bundle.

Approval for the IGNOU MAPFHS Project often arrives with a comment such as “add a sample size” or “narrow the area”. Learners who skip those points in the report give the examiner an easy question.

Most MEDSP-071 approvals we see carry at least one correction or modification point, so read the office box before you start writing chapters.

When asked to resubmit, many learners send only the new proposal. For MEDSP-071 the rejected proposal and the commented proforma must go in the same envelope.

MEDSP 071 project report: one page order from two handbook lists

The MEDSP 071 project report has two contents lists in the same handbook. Section 7(1) gives nine parts ending with Summary; the “Format for Project Report” list gives fourteen, with Review of Literature, Conclusion, Limitations and Suggestions for Further Work. The order below keeps every part from both, so an examiner reading either list finds what it expects.

After approval, MAPFHS learners often ask us which of the two lists to follow. The merged order above answers both, and it adds nothing the handbook does not name.

Page order is the doubt we hear most at the binding stage of MEDSP-071 reports, especially where the approved proforma goes. Both handbook lists put it second, straight after the title page.

Reports come back when a required page is missing. For MEDSP-071 the pages people forget are the approved Annexure II and the Annexure III certificate with both signatures.

IGNOU MAPFHS project hard copy: length, spacing and binding

The IGNOU MAPFHS project hard copy that the handbook describes is one typed, hard bound original. Section 7(1) sets the length at about 40 to 50 typed pages at 1.5 line spacing, not exceeding about 10,000 words excluding appendices and exhibits, with 10 percent variation either way.

Some reports we receive for binding run well past 10,000 words. For MEDSP-071 that is about 11,000 words at the upper edge, appendices aside, so trim before printing.

We still see students planning a spiral bound MEDSP-071 report because it is cheaper. The handbook asks for a hard bound copy.

Learners often ask how many copies of the MAPFHS report to post. The handbook asks for one original to SED; the second copy is yours to keep.

Review of literature and APA references for MEDSP-071

For the IGNOU MAPFHS Project the Format list defines the review of literature as the body of earlier work in books, journals and articles that helps you frame your questions. References follow APA style and are listed alphabetically; the handbook prints examples for a book, a journal article, a book chapter and a website with its accessed date. Block 3 and Block 4 of MEDS-075 cover data collection, analysis and report writing.

The correction we see most often on MAPFHS approvals is to bring the review of literature up to date. Population data move fast, so a review that stops before NFHS-5 is easy to spot.

Many reports carry the same old review the proposal had. In our experience an outdated review costs a MEDSP-071 report, even when the fieldwork is sound.

References that switch between styles, or list sources the report does not use, are common in the reports we see. MEDSP-071 sets APA, alphabetical, so one pass with the handbook’s examples fixes most of it.

Results and discussion built on your own MEDSP-071 data

The handbook asks that findings be reported in tables and graphs after statistical analysis, then discussed against existing studies, with the implications drawn out. For an IGNOU MAPFHS Project survey that means frequency tables by age, sex, caste or income group, and any cross-tables your objectives need, using the statistical tools you named in the proposal.

In many reports the analysis chapter is too thin to answer the objectives. If a MEDSP-071 objective asks about the link between education and contraceptive use, a single overall percentage does not answer it.

Many MAPFHS learners plan a study on secondary data alone, such as NFHS state tables. The handbook allows secondary data but calls a primary survey far more reliable, so a small field survey beside the published figures makes a stronger MEDSP-071 study.

Title page, originality certificate and the supervisor’s bill

The IGNOU MAPFHS Project handbook gives a model title page in Annexure V, the originality certificate in Annexure III and the supervisor’s bill in Annexure IV. The Format list says the title page should show the project course code, the title, your name, enrolment number, address, school and year.

The Format list prints the course code as “MDVP-117”, the MA Development Studies project code; the model page in Annexure V uses MEDSP-071, which is the code for this course. The Format list also asks for your address while the model shows none, so adding it under your name meets both. Annexure III must be signed by you and by the supervisor with place and date, and the Annexure IV bill (Rs 500 per student) goes with your cover letter.

A MEDSP-071 report with only the student’s signature on the Annexure III certificate is one we have seen go out more than once. Get the supervisor’s signature before binding.

Reports we check often leave out the appendix. The handbook lists the interview schedule or questionnaire you used as Appendix 1 of a MAPFHS report.

Some learners bind the filled-in schedules at the back. The MEDSP-071 handbook asks for the schedule or questionnaire used, so one blank copy is the usual practice; keep the filled forms safe.

MAPFHS project submission: hard bound by post, or the December 2026 upload

MAPFHS project submission has two routes in 2026. The January 2024 handbook asks for the hard bound report by post. For the December 2026 Term-end Examination, IGNOU’s OPMS guidelines, as we read them on 2 November 2026, ask for an online upload instead, with no hard copy to SED or the Regional Centre after uploading.

In each cycle a few learners e-mail the MEDSP-071 report to SOEDS or to a coordinator. Neither the handbook nor the December 2026 OPMS rules treat that as a submission.

If you post the hard bound MAPFHS report, keep the Speed post receipt with the tracking number. Learners who skip it have nothing to show when a result does not appear.

Rs 500 evaluation fee for an 8-credit MEDSP-071 project

The July 2026 Common Prospectus (section 1.17) sets the project evaluation fee at Rs 300 for a project of up to 4 credits and Rs 500 for a larger one. MEDSP-071 carries 8 credits, so the IGNOU MAPFHS Project fee is Rs 500. For the December 2026 cycle, the SED notice sets 30 November 2026 as the last date to pay it through Samarth, and OPMS asks for the fee before the upload.

The Rs 300 and Rs 500 amounts confuse many learners. For MEDSP-071 the answer is Rs 500, because the course is above 4 credits.

100 marks, 40 percent, and no viva in the MAPFHS files

Section 8 of the handbook gives the IGNOU MAPFHS Project 100 marks, with a minimum of 40 percent to complete it. The Student Evaluation Division picks the examiner from a list approved by SOEDS, and section 6.0 of the Programme Guide gives the evaluation report the full weight of the course. Neither the handbook nor the Programme Guide describes a viva for MEDSP-071, and the evaluated report is not returned.

Learners often ask us whether a viva is coming. For MEDSP-071 neither IGNOU file read for this page mentions one; if your Regional Centre ever writes to you about a viva, follow that letter.

Nine places the MAPFHS files disagree with each other

The MEDSP-071 handbook was adapted from SOEDS handbooks for other programmes, and a few lines were carried over unchanged. None of these slips stops you, but each one has misled learners we have spoken to.

Reading a MEDSP-071 sample set without borrowing its topic

A sample IGNOU MAPFHS Project set shows the shape of a finished study: how the objectives line up with the schedule, how the tables are laid out and how the discussion uses earlier studies. It is a study reference. Your title, your village or ward, your respondents and your words are what SOEDS approves and what Annexure III certifies, and the product pages themselves warn that IGNOU does not accept repeated projects.

Topics copied from widely shared material, or from the same outside source as other learners, often turn up twice at evaluation, and a duplicate topic is a common reason for return. A MEDSP-071 title built on your own district rarely meets that problem.

Some MAPFHS learners reach us so close to the 30 April or 31 October target that no time is left to write the proposal themselves. Starting the seven headings a month earlier removes that pressure.

Many learners draft the MEDSP-071 proposal with ChatGPT or a similar tool before reading the handbook, and the draft then misses headings the handbook asks for, such as Limitations, or the locale and sampling under methodology.

AI drafts, internet text and the Annexure III certificate

The Annexure III certificate states that your IGNOU MAPFHS Project report is your original work and has not been submitted earlier to IGNOU or any other institution. Your signature and your supervisor’s sit under that sentence, so any text that is not yours, or not cited, puts both names at risk.

Some reports reach evaluation as AI output pasted in unchanged, which is one more reason the same MAPFHS topics keep appearing in the same words.

Many learners lift paragraphs from websites into the MEDSP-071 review of literature without running any plagiarism check. Cite each source in APA style and write the summary in your own words.

IGNOU MAPFHS Project questions found in search

Your first five MEDSP-071 moves

For the theory side of MAPFHS, see the MAPFHS books, the MAPFHS guess papers, the MAPFHS solved assignments and the MAPFHS handwritten assignment set. Other courses are on the IGNOU projects and IGNOU project hard copy pages.

If you want a MEDSP-071 project planned around your own topic and supervisor, see our customised project service.

IGNOU and SOEDS files behind this page

shrichakradhar.com is an independent publisher and is not affiliated with, authorised by or endorsed by IGNOU. Reference projects are study material and are not for submission as your own work.